Digital Imagination

“…African Americans, in a very real sense, are the descendants of alien abductees; they inhabit a sci-fi nightmare in which unseen but no less impassable force fields of intolerance frustrate their movements; official histories undo what has been done; and technology is too often brought to bear on black bodies (branding, forced sterilization, the Tuskegee experiment, and tasers come readily to mind).”

—           Mark Dery (Excerpt from Black to the Future: Interviews with Samuel Delany, Greg Tate, and Tricia Rose)

(I’m currently enrolled in a Coursera course called E-learning and Digital Cultures, and this week we were asked to think about utopias and dystopias.)

Notions of utopia/dystopia are inherently political, since they say something about the relation between the multitude and its material reality. Both utopias and dystopias raise the complex question of freedom and control.

Most authors of colour have conceptualized utopias and dystopias in starkly different ways than White authors. The real world presents for authors of colour already, as Maria Varsam noted “a “dystopian continuum” in which not only [do] extreme forms of oppression and alienation co-exist with lesser forms, but also one’s place on the continuum is subject to unpredictable change.” We already exist in an anti-utopian reality in which bodies of colour are regulated through technologies and “violence directed against bodies of colour becomes normalized as a necessary part of the civilizing process”—a reality, in which civil liberties are eroded under the guise of ‘security.’ Lord of the Flies, for instance, has already shown us how easily we can “regress” to dystopian states.

Authors of dystopias expose what might happen when utopian ideas are taken to the extreme. In This Perfect Day Ira Levin shows us the dangers of taking egalitarianism and altruism to excess. Ralph Raico writes that in This Perfect Day,

“Genetics has progressed to the point where skin color (tan), body shape (unisex), and facial features (brown slanted eyes) ran mostly be programmed. Scientists are busily at work rooting out the biological basis of aggressiveness and egotism and implanting docility and loving kindness in their stead. The aim is to have this compassionate race expand across the universe, and space exploration is another of the Family’s unifying collective goals.”

Race, it seems, has a way of creeping into technologies (from facial recognition software, to forensic technologies, to video games). Race matters in digital spaces, and information technologies are not intrinsically neutral. Tara McPherson argues in Why Are the Digital Humanities So White? or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation that “technological formations are deeply bound up with our racial formations.” McPherson further posits that there are “technoracial formations” where race is “a ghost in the digital machine.”

Some forms of technology are, thus, overdetermined as White. And in a world in which White is privileged it is important to ask ourselves whose voices are centred, and whose voices are marginalized. Whose stories get told, and retold? In Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black bell hooks argues that for the oppressed moving “from silence into speech” is a process of healing “that makes new life and new growth possible.” When bell hooks refers to “the liberated voice” she speaks of a utopian vision—a dialogic pedagogy. In Black (Afrofuturist) feminism, as Susana M. Morris notes, “liberation is cast in terms of coalition and power sharing, methodologies that would incite a future quite different from the hegemony of present structures.”

In thinking about utopias/dystopias, I turned to Afrofuturism. Like the early Afrofuturists I’m “concerned primarily with the question of whether or not there will be any future whatsoever for people of color.” Afrofuturism is, at its core, as Kodwo Eshun asserts, “concerned with the possibilities for intervention within the dimension of the predictive, the projected, the proleptic, the envisioned, the virtual, the anticipatory and the future conditional.” How can we re-imagine/remix ourselves? How can we undo the connections between race, gender, sexuality, and ability?

Some of my favourite utopian/dystopian works:

Films:

Strange Days

Dark City

Pumzi

Books:

Erewhon

Dhalgren

Fledgling

I made a word cloud (made with Wordle) of Daniel Chandler’s text Technological determinism to help me keep track of the most commonly used terms.

Word cloud
Word cloud

#EDCMOOC

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Digital Imagination

  1. Hi. Discovered your compelling blog through the EDCMOOC study group section. I’m not African-American, and I related to your latest post re: there already being dystopia for people of color (or in my case, women and lesbians and Jews).

    Also, unless I misunderstood it, I was disappointed by your concluding question, “How can we undo the connections between race, gender, sexuality, and ability?” From my perspective, I never want to undo such connections. I want to make them even more visible. That’s why your blog seems vital: You’re a voice that’s more rare than it should be.

    In the United States, where I come from and am based currently, February is Black History Month. I’m ignorant of whether it’s a global celebration or just a U.S. one. In any case, I just posted the following status update to my Facebook wall:

    “Happy Black History Month! Just came across an interesting blog by a Netherlands-based'”e-learning and Digital Culture’ Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) classmate who blogs on “representations of race and gender in media and pop culture” @ http://discoatemybaby.wordpress.com/

    1. Hi Sarah,

      Thank you for taking time to read and comment on my blog post! I really appreciate it. It’s nice to read you could relate to it. I’ll try to explain what I meant with my concluding question. As a self-identified Queer Black man, and a (post-)colonial subject living in the Metropole, I find the current connections between race, gender, sexuality, and ability restrictive. I have to deal with what Patricia Hill Collins has termed “controlling images,” that is several stereotypical readings of my body that I have to deal with. The truth of the matter is that Black women and men are still read as “sexually insatiable,” or “inherently dangerous/threatening” This is a connection I’d like to do away with.

      Moreover, these connections of hypersexualized and dangerous Black women and men are colonialist constructions. One other such construction is “Whiteness is beauty and power,” which still influences contemporary life in the Caribbean, where colorism is a serious issue (the lighter you are, the higher up the social ladder you are). In education these connections translate as “young Black men aren’t academically inclined,” or if you’re bookish as a Black woman or man you’re “acting White.” These are the connections that we must undo.

      I hope that clarifies what I meant. Thank you again for reading my blog. Do you by any chance have a blog? I’d love to read some of your thoughts on the course.

Comments are closed.